Peer Review Process

JISBI (Journal of Information System and Business Intelligence) menerapkan mekanisme double-blind peer review, di mana identitas penulis dan reviewer dirahasiakan satu sama lain untuk menjamin objektivitas dan keadilan dalam penilaian naskah. Setiap artikel yang masuk akan melalui proses seleksi awal oleh editor, kemudian diteruskan kepada reviewer sesuai bidang keahlian.

Tahapan Proses Review

  1. Pemeriksaan Administratif
    Editorial melakukan pengecekan awal terhadap kelengkapan dokumen, kesesuaian fokus dan lingkup jurnal, serta potensi plagiarisme.

  2. Desk Evaluation oleh Editor
    Editor menilai kualitas umum naskah (kebaruan, kontribusi ilmiah, relevansi). Naskah yang tidak memenuhi standar minimum dapat ditolak pada tahap ini (desk rejection).

  3. Penugasan Reviewer
    Naskah yang lolos desk evaluation dikirim ke dua orang reviewer independen sesuai bidang keahlian.

  4. Proses Penilaian (Double-Blind)
    Reviewer mengevaluasi aspek metodologi, kontribusi ilmiah, kejelasan penyajian, kebaruan, dan validitas hasil.

  5. Keputusan Review
    Hasil evaluasi reviewer dapat berupa:

    • Diterima tanpa revisi

    • Diterima dengan revisi minor

    • Diterima dengan revisi mayor

    • Ditolak

  6. Revisi oleh Penulis
    Penulis melakukan perbaikan sesuai catatan reviewer dan mengunggah versi revisi beserta response to reviewer.

  7. Keputusan Akhir Editor
    Editor mengonfirmasi apakah revisi telah memenuhi standar publikasi.

Durasi Proses Review

Lama proses review umumnya berlangsung antara 4 hingga 8 minggu, tergantung tingkat kompleksitas naskah dan kecepatan penulis dalam melakukan revisi.

---

Peer Review Process

JISBI applies a double-blind peer review mechanism to ensure fairness and objectivity in manuscript evaluation. Both the authors' and reviewers’ identities are concealed throughout the process. All submitted manuscripts undergo preliminary screening before being assigned to qualified reviewers.

Review Stages

  1. Administrative Screening
    The editorial team checks submission completeness, journal scope alignment, and plagiarism level.

  2. Desk Evaluation
    The editor evaluates the manuscript’s relevance, novelty, and academic quality. Manuscripts not meeting the minimum criteria may be desk-rejected.

  3. Reviewer Assignment
    Eligible manuscripts are assigned to two independent reviewers based on expertise.

  4. Blind Review Process
    Reviewers assess methodology, originality, clarity, contribution, and result validity.

  5. Review Decision
    Possible outcomes include:

    • Accepted (no revision)

    • Accepted with minor revision

    • Accepted with major revision

    • Rejected

  6. Revision and Resubmission
    Authors revise the manuscript according to reviewer feedback and resubmit with a revision statement.

  7. Final Editorial Decision
    The editor confirms whether the revised version meets publication standards.

Review Time

The review process typically takes 4 to 8 weeks, depending on manuscript quality and revision duration.